Magia Naturalis: Forerunner of Science
by Beezone
Preface
Reading Frances A. Yates’s Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition opened a window into part of history that I had never fully appreciated. While delving into Chapter V, which discusses Pico della Mirandola and Cabalist Magic, I encountered the term magia naturalis. At first, I approached it with the modern lens through which “magic” often means illusion or trickery. However, it became clear that in the context of the Renaissance, this term signified something very different.
My inquiry into magia naturalis spark my interest in how early Hermetic, Christian, and Cabalist thinkers viewed the natural world. Their exploration of hidden forces and divine correspondences laid a foundation for what would later evolve into modern science. This essay is the result of my study and attempt to understand how natural magic (not the illusionary kind!) bridged the mystical and empirical worlds that grew into the current method of attempting to understand the universe and how it, Science, also can rightfully be called, Magia Naturalis.
Magia Naturalis as the Foundation of Early Scientific Inquiry
The term magia naturalis (natural magic) evokes images of mystery and hidden forces, but in its historical context, it represents the profound intellectual bridge between mysticism and the scientific revolution. Far from being a realm of illusion or superstition, magia naturalis was a precursor to modern science, fostering an exploratory attitude toward the natural world that laid the groundwork for empirical inquiry. Rooted in the Hermetic, Christian, and Cabalist traditions of the Renaissance, this intellectual current wove together spiritual aspiration and empirical curiosity, setting the stage for a transformative understanding of the universe.
The Concept of Magia Naturalis
In the Renaissance, magia naturalis referred to the study and manipulation of the natural world to uncover its hidden laws, which were believed to be divinely ordained. Thinkers like Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola viewed natural magic as a means of bridging the physical and spiritual realms. They were inspired by the Hermetic maxim as above, so below, which suggested that celestial forces influenced earthly phenomena and that understanding one realm could illuminate the other.
This pursuit was not mere mysticism but an attempt to engage systematically with nature. Practitioners believed that nature was imbued with divine order and that understanding its workings was a form of worship. Their inquiries included astrology, alchemy, and the use of talismans, practices aimed at revealing the correspondences between the macrocosm (the universe) and the microcosm (human beings). These endeavors reflected a proto-scientific mindset, emphasizing observation, experimentation, and synthesis.
Pico’s Expansion on Magia Naturalis
Pico della Mirandola’s contributions to the development of magia naturalis marked a significant evolution in the Renaissance understanding of magic and its role in human inquiry. While Marsilio Ficino had introduced a restrained form of natural magic rooted in Neoplatonic thought, Pico expanded upon this by integrating practical Cabala, a form of spiritual magic aimed at accessing higher divine powers. This combination of magia naturalis and Cabalist magic not only elevated the intellectual status of the Renaissance Magus but also set a precedent for blending mystical traditions with systematic inquiry.
- Blending Natural and Spiritual Magic:
- Pico’s magia naturalis went beyond Ficino’s focus on natural substances and sympathies. It incorporated practical Cabala, which aimed to invoke angels, archangels, and divine powers through the sacred Hebrew language and mystical meditations. This higher spiritual magic sought to connect humanity directly with the divine, moving beyond the material cosmos to access the powers of God himself.
- Harmonizing Hermetism and Cabalism:
- For Pico, the mystical teachings of Hermetism and Cabalism complemented one another. Both traditions emphasized the power of the Word (Logos) in creation, aligning with Christian theology. Hermetism celebrated the luminous Word in the Pimander, while Cabalist thought revered the Hebrew letters as vehicles of divine power.
- This synthesis allowed Pico to frame his magic as a unifying force that bridged Gentile and Hebrew mystical traditions, ultimately confirming the divinity of Christ.
- The Renaissance Magus:
- Pico’s vision of the Magus was profoundly ambitious. He described the Magus as a mediator who “marries earth to heaven,” uniting the forces of the natural world with the gifts of the divine. This notion of the Magus as both scientist and priest foreshadowed the intellectual autonomy that would later characterize the Scientific Revolution.
- Magia as a Systematic Discipline:
- In his Nine Hundred Theses, Pico distinguished between “bad magic,” which the Church condemned, and “good magic,” which he defined as a natural philosophy rooted in the principles of sympathy and divine order. His emphasis on “characters and figures” as operative elements in natural magic reflected a move toward codifying magical practices into a systematic discipline.
- Implications for Rational Inquiry:
- By elevating magia naturalis and integrating it with practical Cabala, Pico set the stage for a more structured exploration of natural and divine forces. His work exemplifies the Renaissance shift from personal, religious mysticism to a universal, intellectual framework for understanding reality.
This expansion of magia naturalis reflects Pico’s unique ability to harmonize diverse traditions while advocating for a bold, integrative approach to human knowledge. His synthesis of Hermetic, Cabalist, and Christian thought remains a cornerstone of Renaissance intellectual history, illustrating the gradual transition from spirituality to rationality that shaped the modern worldview.
The Role of Hermeticism and Cabalism
Hermetic texts, particularly the Corpus Hermeticum, emphasized humanity’s potential to achieve divine-like knowledge through the study of nature. These works encouraged Renaissance thinkers to explore the “hidden” aspects of the world, blending mystical insight with rational investigation. Cabalist traditions, integrated into Christian thought by figures like Pico, further enriched this perspective. By seeking the divine through sacred texts and symbols, Cabalist magic provided a framework for understanding the spiritual significance of natural phenomena.
Pico’s synthesis of Cabalism, Hermeticism, and Christianity exemplified the Renaissance’s eclectic approach to knowledge. He viewed natural magic as a way to ascend spiritually, linking the intellectual exploration of the natural world with the soul’s divine journey. This blending of traditions fostered a holistic view of knowledge, where empirical and spiritual pursuits were intertwined.
For the Renaissance mind, which loved symmetrical arrangements, there was a certain parallelism between the writings of Hermes Trismegistus, the Egyptian Moses, and Cabala which was a Jewish mystical tradition supposed to have been handed down orally from Moses himself. In common with all Cabalists, Pico firmly believed in this extreme antiquity of the Cabalistic teachings as going right back to Moses, as a secret doctrine which Moses had imparted to some initiates who had handed it on, and which unfolded mysteries not fully explained by the patriarch in Genesis. The Cabala is not, I believe, ever called a prisca theo- logia for this term applied to Gentile sources of ancient wisdom, and this was a more sacred wisdom, being Hebrew wisdom. And since, for Pico, Cabala confirmed the truth of Christianity, Christian Cabala was a Hebrew-Christian source of ancient wisdom, and one which he found it most valuable and instructive to compare with Gentile ancient wisdoms, and above all with that of Hermes Trismegistus who particularly lent himself to Pico’s essays in comparative religion because he was so closely parallel to Moses, as the Egyptian law-giver and author of the inspired Egyptian Genesis, the Pimander.
Looking at the Hermetic writings and at Cabala with the eyes of Pico, certain symmetries begin to present themselves to our enraptured gaze. The Egyptian law-giver had given utterance to wonderful mystical teachings, including an account of creation in which he seemed to know something of what Moses knew. With this body of mystical teaching there went a magic, the magic of the Asclepius. In Cabala, too, there was a marvellous body of mystical teaching, derived from the Hebrew law-giver, and new light on the Mosaic mysteries of creation. Pico lost himself in these wonders in which he saw the divinity of Christ verified. And with Cabala, too, there went a kind of magic, practical Cabala.
Hermetism and Cabalism also corroborated one another on a theme which was fundamental for them both, namely the creation by the Word. The mysteries of the Hermetica are mysteries of the Word, or the Logos, and in the Pimander, it was by the luminous Word, the Son of God issuing from the Nous that the creative act was made. In Genesis, “God spoke” to form the created world, and, since He spoke in Hebrew, this is why for the Cabalist the words and letters of the Hebrew tongue are subjects for endless mystical meditations, and why, for the practical Cabalist, they contain magical power. Lactantius may have helped to cement the union between Hermetism and Christian Cabalism on this point, for, after quoting from the Psalm “By the word of God were the heavens made”, and from St. John, “In the beginning was the Word”, he adds that this is supported from the Gentiles. “For
Trismegistus, who by some means or other searched into almost all truth, often described the excellence and the majesty of the Word”, and he acknowledged “that there is an ineffable and sacred speech, the relation of which exceeds the measure of man’s ability.”
The marrying together of Hermetism and Cabalism, of which Pico was the instigator and founder, was to have momentous results, and the subsequent Hermetic-Cabalist tradition, ultimately stemming from him, was of most far-reaching importance. It could be purely mystical, developing Hermetic and Cabalist meditations on creation and on man into immensely complex labyrinths of religious speculation, involving numerological and harmonic aspects into which Pythagoreanism was absorbed. But it also had its magical side, and here, too, Pico was the founder who first united the Hermetic and Cabalist types of magic.
Instruments of Discovery: Telescopes, Microscopes, and Optics
The Renaissance’s intellectual spirit found tangible expression in technological innovations. Instruments like the telescope and microscope allowed thinkers to extend human perception into previously inaccessible realms. These tools paralleled the aims of magia naturalis, revealing the unseen forces and structures of nature.
The telescope, championed by figures like Galileo Galilei, revealed the celestial mechanics that validated Copernican heliocentrism. The microscope, pioneered by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek and Robert Hooke, unveiled the intricate complexity of the microcosm. These discoveries aligned with the Hermetic idea of uncovering the hidden truths of nature, bridging mystical aspiration and empirical reality.
From Mysticism to Mechanism
While magia naturalis emphasized the divine order and spiritual significance of natural forces, its methods and attitudes directly influenced the mechanistic worldview that emerged in the Scientific Revolution. Early scientists like Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton operated within a framework informed by mystical traditions. Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, for instance, were inspired by his belief in a harmonious cosmic order, an idea rooted in Hermeticism.
The shift from mystical exploration to mechanistic explanation was facilitated by the application of mathematics. Figures like Galileo and Descartes began to describe natural phenomena in quantifiable terms, transforming magia naturalis into a more structured and predictive discipline. Yet, the spirit of inquiry—the desire to uncover the hidden laws of nature—remained a legacy of natural magic.
The Ethical and Philosophical Foundations
An essential aspect of magia naturalis was its ethical and philosophical foundation. Practitioners saw their work as aligned with divine will, framing their inquiries as morally and spiritually significant. This perspective distinguished natural magic from superstition, legitimizing it as a noble endeavor. It also set a precedent for the moral considerations that continue to shape scientific inquiry today.
Conclusion
Magia naturalis was far more than an intellectual curiosity of the Renaissance; it was a cornerstone of the scientific enterprise. By integrating mystical traditions with empirical observation, Renaissance thinkers bridged the gap between the spiritual and material worlds. Their work laid the foundations for modern science, fostering a spirit of exploration that transformed humanity’s understanding of the cosmos. The legacy of magia naturalis reminds us that the pursuit of knowledge is as much about uncovering the hidden truths of nature as it is about deepening our connection to the divine.
Bibliography
Yates, Frances A. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. University of Chicago Press, 1964.
Ficino, Marsilio. The Letters of Marsilio Ficino. Translated by members of the Language Department of the School of Economic Science, Shepheard-Walwyn, 1975.
Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. Oration on the Dignity of Man. Translated by A. Robert Caponigri, Regnery Publishing, 1956.
Copenhaver, Brian P. Magic and the Dignity of Man: Pico della Mirandola and His Oration in Modern Memory. Belknap Press, 2019.
Kepler, Johannes. Harmonices Mundi (The Harmony of the World). Translated by E. J. Aiton, A. M. Duncan, and J. V. Field, American Philosophical Society, 1997.
Hooke, Robert. Micrographia. Royal Society, 1665.
Newton, Isaac. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman, University of California Press, 1999.
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Harvard University Press, 1991.